How do civil society organizations mobilize on climate change? Why do they choose certain strategies over others? What are the consequences of these choices? Networks in Contention examines how the interactions between different organizations within the international climate change movement shape strategic decisions and the kinds of outcomes organizations are able to achieve. First, it documents how and why cleavages emerged in this once-unified movement around the time of the 2009 Copenhagen Summit. Second, it shows how an organization's position in the movement's network has a large influence on the tactics it adopts. Finally, it demonstrates how the development of new strategies within this network has influenced the trajectory of global climate politics. The book establishes the ways in which networks are consequential for civil society groups, exploring how these actors can become more effective and suggesting lessons for the future coordination of activism.

It received the 2015 Best Book Award from the American Political Science Association's Political Networks Section, the 2016 Levine Prize for Best Book in Comparative Administration and Public Policy from the International Political Science Association, the 2016 Don K. Price Award for the Best Book in Science, Technology, and Environmental Politics from the American Political Science Association, the 2016 Lynton Keith Caldwell Award for Best Book in Environmental Politics and Policy in the past three years from the American Political Science Association (co-recipient), and an honorable mention for the 2016 Sprout Award from the Environmental Studies Section of the International Studies Association.  

Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in contention: The divisive politics of climate change. Cambridge University Press.